- Home
- Opinion & Analysis
- China's Olympic embarrassment
China's Olympic embarrassment
- By Cam MacMurchy
- Published July 30, 2008
- Opinion & Analysis
-
Rating:




A steam bath at the Forbidden City
BEIJING – China is a land of contradictions. I think I speak for many foreigners living here that one minute, you wouldn’t want to be anywhere else – the next minute, you want to be anywhere else.
We’ve been roundly criticized on this blog for being anti-Chinese or biased, especially during the Tibetan controversy back in May (and how long ago that now seems). We took the tack, at that time, that criticism is directed at the government and not the people, a distinction we argued can be difficult to make in a country where the government is perceived to be the people.
The contradiction here, of course, is that as a foreigner who is heavily invested in China (I’ve lived here for four years and have a long-term Chinese girlfriend) I continue to love the people of this country and recognize their great potential to change the world. But while I feel this way about the Chinese people, I feel – again – that the government is letting them down on the world stage to the point of near embarrassment. And I’m frustrated – and perhaps slightly disappointed – that many Chinese people fail to at least recognize this perspective, if not agree with it.
I was in Osaka over the past several days and spent some time watching CNN while in my hotel room. Obviously the stories were focused on the Olympics, and Beijing’s notoriously bad air quality seemed to lead off the news each time I turned it on. In one instance, anchor Kristie Lu Stout stood before a large plasma-screen which showed a picture of Beijing. As she correctly pointed out, the skyline was barely visible through the thick smog. Then CNN cut to this quote from Du Shaozhong, the Deputy Director of the Beijing Municipal Environment Protection Bureau, which I found via the Wall Street Journal:
It is quite natural. For example, when you are taking a bath in the bathroom, you are unable to see the one opposite us. It does not mean there is pollution.
Lu Stout returned and, deliberately or not, left a long pause before saying something to the effect of “Okay, moving right along.” The absurdness of the quote above, and what it implies, is almost laughable. Does Beijing really believe that there is no pollution? Or that pollution levels are not severe or even slightly dangerous? And how long can this government call black white, and have people believe it?
And make no mistake, people do believe it. The people arriving from abroad won’t, but the people in China will. I’ve had numerous first-hand accounts of Chinese friends asking me why foreigners keep complaining about the pollution. “It’s not that bad,” a colleague at China Radio International once told me. That colleague, of course, had never been outside of China and didn’t have much to compare it to.
Then there’s the people interviewed by CNN outside the Bird’s Nest. I couldn’t find their exact quotes, but they were along the same lines: This is a normal weather pattern. It will be okay. It's not that bad.
But it is that bad. The Chinese government can fool some of its own people, perhaps, but I’ll take the word of the World Health Organization, which reported that for four days last week pollution levels were triple what the organization recommends.
The PR fallout from this, of course, is China looking foolish. The government has, for years, been explaining away the pollution and justifying its own measures with little or no results. Stories are printed, almost daily, in the Chinese media about the actions the government is taking to clean the air and make it, as John Stewart once joked, “hospitable for human life.” Right now, though, the rhetoric is meeting reality, and the rhetoric is being unmasked for what it is: pure propaganda at best, and outright lying at worst.
Caught in the middle are the Chinese people, who after listening and believing the government for so long are embarrassing themselves by parroting the government line on international television. I’m not advocating a revolt, but the Chinese people need to demand more honesty and accountability from their government. If they choose not to, they must accept the fallout, which will be intense criticism of China and potentially a very negative global image of their country.
Throughout history, the Chinese government has always been viewed as a “paternal” force for the Chinese people. The rulers are given a mandate of heaven, and may retain that mandate by looking after the people. This government has perfected the balancing act of alienating those abroad, bringing unnecessary criticism to China, and polluting the air that Chinese people must breathe every day. But it has succeeded in convincing large swathes of the Chinese people that it has their best interests at heart. China will become a truly global country when it realizes that governments – both western and Chinese – make their own survival the top priority. China’s government has some accomplishments the people can be proud of. But when it makes mistakes and causes international embarrassment for the people of China, the citizens of this great country need to stand up and make it clear that they demand the truth.
Spread The Word
5 Responses to "China's Olympic embarrassment" 
|
said this on 30 Jul 2008 3:54:45 AM PST
It's amazing how people can come to believe things if they are told often enough. On all the issues that the CCP has done this to very many local people, telling them the air isn't that bad is a cinch.
|
|
said this on 31 Jul 2008 5:40:00 AM PST
First, I have this blog in my auto-load bunch for when I sit down to my computer, so needless to say, I enjoy reading it. But I thought this post missed the mark a little.
For the common people, this not about lies, or believing lies. It's about face. It's how it's absolutely taboo in public to criticize someone in a higher social/political/business positions for their failing, because that person would lose face. So in public, something transparently untrue is offered as an excuse, so the more senior person can save face. Maybe the director of sales got drunk the night before a persentation, missed it, and lost the sale. The potential customers even came to the office and left. The next day it's the gossip of the office. Yet if higher-ups are not planing to get rid of him, they will let him put forward some face-saving explanation like the customers had the time wrong and were not really interested. Everyone knows what really happened. Everyone can know the excuse is BS. But no one can say it publicly, because then the more senior person will lose face. For someone in a lower position, the situation is reversed. The criticism can be piled on from people in higher positions, and those people must agree. They will lose face, and confirm their subordinate position. So now this is projected onto the world stage. This is the moment China shows its face to the world. So foreign reporters come in, and say, didn't the government really f*** up pollution control? Now the common person generally has eyes and a nose and a brain. But to confirm it would cause the government to lose face, and as a result, the person would be putting the foreigner in the higher position, and the Chinese government in the lower position. So instead, the government offers transparently (no pun intended) BS explanations. Like taking a bath in a bathroom? Everyone can see this is BS. But especially when foreigners come calling, everyone goes along with it. The Chinese government needs the people's support at this moment--it needs basic respect. It needs to save face. "A face-saving story" actually translates very well. But I bet the "brainwashed masses" explanation wins out. It would be to much to hope that befuddling cross-cultural confusion leads the media to look for a different explanation, instead of confirming old ones. |
|
said this on 31 Jul 2008 6:23:12 AM PST
Mike... thanks for regularly checking the blog. You made a a great response, and indeed I tend to agree with what you are saying. The problem is in different interpretations of face. Perhaps China's response is in-line with hundreds (or thousands) of years of customs, but unfortunately foreign reporters won't pick that up. Beijing is actually <i>losing</i> face with foreigners when it thinks its doing something to gain face. I think more cultural understanding is required on both sides, but if Beijing wants to look proud, confident, and capable on the global stage, it needs to learn how to work with the foreign media. Although, perhaps that was never the goal.
|
|
said this on 31 Jul 2008 7:31:10 AM PST
Of course, for people hoping that everything goes well for China, it almost doesn't need to be said that the government in Beijing has no idea how all this looks, and it desperately needs to think about how it's actions look overseas. It needs to play to its audience, at the least.
Still, the man on the street doesn't have cross-cultural PR strategies, and this is where I think there needs to be focus. My take is this is shaping up to be a vicious cycle: The foreign media are just going to be egged on by steadfast denials of problems by the government, which (for face reasons) are only going to make the denials more intense. Most common people will go along with this, especially at this moment with the rest of the world is watching. So during this coming month, the foreign media will be thinking "a lying government and a whole country brainwashed or in denial." Where as Chinese people and the government, who will actually be aligned here, will be thinking, "the Western media and people are doing nothing but talk directly about our problems and demand we acknowledge them--during what was supposed to be our moment in the sun!" Unfortunately, I think this is not going to be pretty. |
|
said this on 01 Aug 2008 5:05:49 AM PST
What the Chinese people really need to demand is for you and many other foreign critics to stop repeating the incredibly arrogant and ridiculous notion that the Chinese are only defending their government because of inability to distinct between attacks against the "regime" from those against themselves.
No people in the world - except sociopaths - are limited to feeling hurt only if they're personally the target of insult. Considering how crazy the American voters behave in an election year like this one, I don't think there is a substantive difference between, for example, the emotional attachment of the HuffPo readers to the Democratic Party and the Chinese "angry youth" to the CCP. That said, I certainly agree that the Chinese citizens need to have less public tolerance for the mistakes of their government. |

Author/Admin)